Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Subscribe
    • Shares
    • News
      • Featured Company
      • News Overview
        • Company news
        • Expert Columns
        • Germany
        • USA
        • Price movements
        • Default values
        • Small caps
        • Business
      • News Search
        • Stock News
        • CFD News
        • Foreign exchange news
        • ETF News
        • Money, Career & Lifestyle News
      • Index News
        • DAX News
        • MDAX News
        • TecDAX News
        • Dow Jones News
        • Eurostoxx News
        • NASDAQ News
        • ATX News
        • S&P 500 News
      • Other Topics
        • Private Finance News
        • Commodity News
        • Certificate News
        • Interest rate news
        • SMI News
        • Nikkei 225 News1
    • Carbon Markets
    • Raw materials
    • Funds
    • Bonds
    • Currency
    • Crypto
    • English
      • العربية
      • 简体中文
      • Nederlands
      • English
      • Français
      • Deutsch
      • Italiano
      • Português
      • Русский
      • Español
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Home » US Supreme Court rebuffs Uber, Lyft bid to avoid California driver suits
    Cryptocurrency News

    US Supreme Court rebuffs Uber, Lyft bid to avoid California driver suits

    userBy userOctober 7, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    By Daniel Wiessner

    (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a challenge by Uber (UBER) and Lyft (LYFT) to lawsuits by the state of California on behalf of drivers who signed agreements to keep legal disputes with the ride-hailing companies out of court in a legal fight over their status as contractors.

    The justices turned away appeals by the two companies of a lower court’s ruling that let the Democratic-led state’s attorney general and labor commissioner pursue claims that Uber and Lyft owe money to drivers who were misclassified as independent contractors rather than employees.

    The companies have argued that federal law bars states from suing on behalf of anyone who signed agreements to bring legal disputes in private arbitration rather than court. That includes more than 60 million U.S. workers and virtually any consumer who joins a subscription service, accepts a company’s terms of service or registers a product.

    California filed separate lawsuits against the companies in 2020. A state appeals court in 2023 ruled against the companies in their challenge to the lawsuits. The California Supreme Court subsequently declined to hear their appeals.

    California is one of several Democratic-led states that have accused Uber and Lyft of depriving drivers of minimum wage, overtime pay, reimbursements for expenses and other protections by labeling them as independent contractors. Most federal and state wage laws apply only to employees, making it much cheaper for companies to hire contractors.

    Uber, Lyft and other app-based services have denied that they are employers of “gig workers” who may benefit from the flexibility of contracting.

    The industry has advocated for state ballot measures allowing companies to treat workers as contractors in exchange for providing certain benefits. California’s top state court in July upheld such a measure backed by Uber and Lyft and overwhelmingly approved by voters in the state in 2020.

    Uber and Lyft in June agreed to adopt a $32.50 hourly minimum pay standard for Massachusetts drivers and pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit by the Democratic-led state’s attorney general alleging they improperly treated drivers as independent contractors.

    Uber and Lyft also have been sued by thousands of U.S. drivers who have said they should have been treated as employees. But few of those cases have yielded definitive rulings and many of them have been sent to arbitration, since most of the drivers for the companies sign arbitration agreements.

    (Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York; Editing by Will Dunham)



    Source link

    Share this:

    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

    Like this:

    Like Loading...

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleInvestment Opportunities in Mexico | CFA Institute Enterprising Investor
    Next Article Supreme Court rejects Martin Shkreli appeal on pharma fine
    user
    • Website

    Related Posts

    What Does It Mean to Be Risk Neutral as an Investor?

    January 18, 2025

    SLB boosts dividend and buybacks, but warns of oil oversupply

    January 17, 2025

    Intel Stock Soars as Takeover Speculation Spreads

    January 17, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

    © 2025 StockNews24. Designed by Sujon.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    %d