In 2010, several herds of cows airlifted from North Dakota to Kazakhstan helped spark a burgeoning cattle industry in the former USSR republic.
The effort was part of a Kazakh government initiative to build out the country’s moribund cattle industry, which has steadily expanded since. At the forefront of this initiative is KazBeef, a company dedicated to achieving “net zero” emissions in its beef and dairy operations—a tall task, as livestock remains one of the biggest global sources of methane, a particularly potent greenhouse gas.
To aim for net zero, the company is grazing cattle on Kazakhstan’s vast grasslands in a way that enables the soil to soak up more carbon. The process would then generate verified carbon credits that could theoretically offset some of the company’s livestock emissions, or be purchased by other companies to do the same. But skeptics have raised a variety of concerns over the concept of “climate-smart beef,” and question the validity of emission reductions in an industry that relies on cows, which burp out staggering amounts of climate-warming gas each year.
My colleague Georgina Gustin visited Kazakhstan to report on KazBeef’s operations and efforts to beef up the livestock industry in the world’s largest landlocked nation. I asked Georgina to tell me more about her experiences in the Kazakh steppe and how carbon credits work in the cattle industry.
Q: How did you learn about this situation, and what were your first thoughts when you arrived in Kazakhstan?
I actually learned about KazBeef, North Dakota-based company EcoBalance and their climate efforts in the most ordinary way—through a press release. The whole idea of “grazing-based credits” really caught my attention and so did the location of the project. Journalists get bombarded with press releases, but this one kind of stood out!
I arrived in Kazakhstan, via Dubai, after being in Zambia for a month, where I was reporting another story. It was 100 degrees Fahrenheit in Zambia and negative 10 degrees in Astana, the Kazakh capital, so my first thought was: It’s really friggin’ cold! Astana felt like it was in the middle of nowhere, but it’s a very modern city with lots of new high rises and broad avenues. It had kind of a space station, outpost-ish vibe. Over the course of the next few days, I spent more time in the countryside and in or near small villages. Out there on the steppe, it’s very sparse and quiet and, frankly, a little bit bleak in places. But it’s also very beautiful in a minimalistic way.
Q: How did you report the story, and did anything surprise you?
I reached out to KazBeef and EcoBalance, first thing. They were both really responsive and open to the idea of me visiting Kazakhstan. They were really generous with their time. Once I started talking to them, it was just a matter of creating a kind of web of sources around the central idea. They first unveiled their concept of climate-smart, grazing-based carbon credits last year at the 28th annual United Nations climate summit (COP28) in Dubai. They’re also selling the product in that country now. The fact that there’s an appetite for it there is a little surprising, given that Dubai is not exactly a climate-conscious place. But, apparently, consumers are willing to pay for steaks and burgers they believe have a lower impact on the climate.
Q: How do KazBeef’s grazing-based credits work?
KazBeef is the first company outside of the U.S. to use a system of “twice over” grazing, developed by EcoBalance, which had previously worked with ranchers in its home state of North Dakota to generate carbon credits by grazing cattle in this way. KazBeef teamed up with EcoBalance to use the same system and is now in the process of trying it out.
In theory, it works like this: Cows graze on grass and are strategically moved around to stimulate more grass growth, which makes the grass better able to store carbon. A company that wants to offset its carbon pollution can then buy a “credit” generated by the grazing process and verified by a third-party company. A company that wants to lower carbon emissions in its own supply chain can also establish what’s known as a carbon inset—the company verifies a carbon credit and uses it to cancel out the emissions it generates in its own supply chain.
Q: Why is the term “climate-smart beef” controversial?
The idea is controversial for a few reasons. Cows generate methane through their burps, which are a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, and some third-party verifiers don’t account for that. They only account for the carbon in the soil. Secondly, the carbon in the soil isn’t always measured consistently or over a sufficiently long period of time, so some scientists think its capacity to offset emissions is limited or just not reliably calculated.
The idea of climate-smart beef is appealing to climate-conscious consumers who want to keep eating beef, but critics say beware of greenwashing. There will likely be more brands advertising “climate friendly” or “climate smart” beef, so caveat emptor.
More Top Climate News
A long-awaited study released by the Biden administration on Tuesday found that continuing to export liquefied natural gas (LNG) could drive up domestic energy costs and pose health risks for coastal communities. The U.S. is currently the world’s biggest gas supplier, and President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to ramp up the fossil fuel industry even more. While the new analysis does not explicitly recommend that the U.S. slow down gas sales around the world, it does reveal some major risks associated with the practice, Brad Plumer and Rebecca F. Elliott report for The New York Times. Members of the oil and gas industry have criticized the study’s findings, which are expected to be used by climate activists in future lawsuits that challenge the creation of new LNG terminals.
New data from the International Energy Agency shows that global coal demand is set to reach a record high this year, despite the rise in renewables in recent years. Not every nation reflects this trend: Some countries, such as the U.S. and Europe, have slowed coal usage in recent years, and the United Kingdom shut down its last remaining coal plant in September. But China, India and countries in Southeast Asia are still burning the fossil fuel at high levels, adding to the world’s overall greenhouse gas emissions, Jillian Ambrose reports for The Guardian.
Abnormally mild winters and warm, wet springs are hindering crop growth in Traverse City, Michigan, known as “the Cherry Capital of the World,” Ayurella Horn-Muller and Izzy Ross report for Grist. Michigan produces one-fifth of the country’s sweet cherries and roughly 75 percent of its tart ones. But unpredictable weather in recent years has destroyed large swaths of the crop and lowered surviving cherries’ quality in some areas. Climate-related pest outbreaks have also taken a toll.
“It’s getting more and more expensive to farm,” Raul Gomez, operations manager at Wunsch Farms, told Grist. “You’re spending a lot more money getting to the finish line.”
In recent years, extreme weather has fueled higher insurance premiums and pushed companies to increasingly drop insurance plans altogether in climate vulnerable areas of the U.S., according to two government reports released this week. An analysis released Wednesday by the Senate Budget Committee found that 1.9 million policies were not renewed from 2018 through 2023. A separate report from Democrats on the congressional Joint Economic Committee showed that Florida tops the list for states facing the highest premium increases and risk rankings, a trend my colleague Amy Green covered in March.
Meanwhile, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration last week discovered two endangered North Atlantic right whales entangled in rope about 50 miles off the coast of Nantucket, Massachusetts. One of the whales is a juvenile and is “likely to die from this injury,” the agency says. Rope entanglements, primarily in gear from the fishing industry, are one of the most common causes of death for these whales, of which there are only around 370 left in the wild, according to a recent analysis. I wrote about this issue—and efforts to combat it—in October, if you’d like to read more.
About This Story
Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
Thank you,
Reporter
Kiley Price is a reporter at Inside Climate News, with a particular interest in wildlife, ocean health, food systems and climate change. She writes ICN’s “Today’s Climate” newsletter, which covers the most pressing environmental news each week.
She earned her master’s degree in science journalism at New York University, and her bachelor’s degree in biology at Wake Forest University. Her work has appeared in National Geographic, Time, Scientific American and more. She is a former Pulitzer Reporting Fellow, during which she spent a month in Thailand covering the intersection between Buddhism and the country’s environmental movement.
