Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Subscribe
    • Shares
    • News
      • Featured Company
      • News Overview
        • Company news
        • Expert Columns
        • Germany
        • USA
        • Price movements
        • Default values
        • Small caps
        • Business
      • News Search
        • Stock News
        • CFD News
        • Foreign exchange news
        • ETF News
        • Money, Career & Lifestyle News
      • Index News
        • DAX News
        • MDAX News
        • TecDAX News
        • Dow Jones News
        • Eurostoxx News
        • NASDAQ News
        • ATX News
        • S&P 500 News
      • Other Topics
        • Private Finance News
        • Commodity News
        • Certificate News
        • Interest rate news
        • SMI News
        • Nikkei 225 News1
    • Carbon Markets
    • Raw materials
    • Funds
    • Bonds
    • Currency
    • Crypto
    • English
      • العربية
      • 简体中文
      • Nederlands
      • English
      • Français
      • Deutsch
      • Italiano
      • Português
      • Русский
      • Español
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Home » Investing firm to stop assessing human rights risk in ‘contiguous territorial disputes’ after scrutiny from pro-Israel groups
    Investments

    Investing firm to stop assessing human rights risk in ‘contiguous territorial disputes’ after scrutiny from pro-Israel groups

    userBy userJanuary 7, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    When investors need help navigating business decisions in conflict zones they turn to specialized firms that are supposed to help them keep clear of human rights abuses. But one of the biggest firms offering advice on environmental, social, and governance issues recently announced that when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it will no longer have anything to say.

    The conflict is just too complicated to weigh in on, Morningstar announced last month, following years of pressure by pro-Israel groups who charged that the ESG field effectively fuels Israel boycotts.

    The company said it devised a new policy that ends coverage of human rights issues connected to “disputes concerning contiguous territories” after an investigation of alleged anti-Israel bias in the company’s research and analysis.

    “This means we won’t cover those areas because human rights issues, when related to contiguous territorial disputes, are less likely to be objective, reliable, or consistent, and subject to complex geopolitical factors, divergent views and conflicting partisan media reports,” Morningstar said in a statement posted to its website.

    The policy change caps off a series of reforms implemented by Morningstar in response to scrutiny by a coalition of pro-Israel groups, including the Jewish Federations of North America, The Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League.

    After initially rejecting allegations that the company inappropriately downgraded Israeli companies and companies doing business in Israel, Morningstar changed course in 2022 when it was on the verge of being blacklisted by Illinois’ public pension systems. The company appointed two people as independent experts and asked them for detailed feedback about its operations.

    The experts, retired U.S. diplomat Alejandro Daniel Wolff and Vanderbilt University law professor Michael Newton, issued recommendations, such as eliminating the use of the term “Occupied Palestinian Territory” from its research products.

    In a report released Dec. 31, the experts announced that Morningstar had implemented changes that adequately address the concerns, noting that the “Israel/Palestinian conflict area” was now excluded from analysis entirely.

    The coalition of pro-Israel groups welcomed the news in a statement, saying it merely wanted Israel held to the same standards as any other country.

    “Our coalition believes structural anti-Israel bias is a form of antisemitism, and we applaud Morningstar’s efforts and good faith cooperation to root out anti-Israel bias from their products,” ,” the statement said. “The experts’ recommendations and the framework Morningstar developed should serve as a model for the entire ESG industry to ensure that credit ratings are not infected with anti-Israel bias.”

    Other regions also now ineligible for analysis under the new rule are the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics in eastern Ukraine; the Essequibo region of Guyana; Kashmir between India and Pakistan; Nagorno Karabakh, contested between Armenia and Azerbaijan; and Western Sahara in Africa, Morningstar told the news outlet Responsible Investor.

    The outlet quoted a variety of voices, including investors and watchdogs, who were critical of the exclusion of contiguous territorial disputes.

    Phil Bloomer, executive director of the Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, for example, called the new rule “mystifying.”

    “This is the reality of most 21st-century conflict,” he said. “Investors need access to more, not less data and understanding of the role of business in contributing to human rights risks and abuse in acute and chronic conflicts.”

    The conclusion of the dispute at Morningstar comes as conservative and pro-Israel groups escalate pressure on another ESG company over the same issue. MSCI is currently pushing back against allegations that it discriminates against Israel with investment ratings that rely on biased sources of information.

    Keep Jewish Stories in Focus.

    JTA has documented Jewish history in real-time for over a century. Keep our journalism strong by joining us in supporting independent, award-winning reporting.



    Source link

    Share this:

    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

    Like this:

    Like Loading...

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleHow much would an investor need in an ISA for £800 in monthly passive income?
    Next Article Nvidia stock soars to all-time high of $153.05 By Investing.com
    user
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Australia’s investment in large-scale wind and solar hits six-year peak | Energy

    February 13, 2025

    Investing in fixed-income ETFs as market weighs Fed forecasts

    February 12, 2025

    Citigroup launches new preferred stock series By Investing.com

    February 12, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

    © 2025 StockNews24. Designed by Sujon.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    %d