A financial advisor told me the pros of building a two-part bond ladder (three-year Treasurys and 10-year corporates) to generate fixed income and cover required minimum distributions (RMDs). What are the cons?
-Ken
When used in the right circumstances and for the right job, bond ladders can provide stable income and a needed buffer against market volatility.
That said, you are right to question the downsides because there are tradeoffs. Financial planning choices are often about balancing tradeoffs. Ideally, you’ll balance them in a way that provides you with the most value in light of your personal needs and concerns.
Here are what I consider to be the two biggest bond ladder tradeoffs. (And if you need more help on bond ladder strategies, consider working with a financial advisor.)
Bond Ladders Don’t Offer Much Growth Potential
The main reason to use a bond ladder is for predictable cash flow. When you need that certainty, bond ladders can provide it with their fixed returns. But that also presents bond laddering’s chief downside.
Fixed-rate investments whose interest and principal are guaranteed, like bonds and certificates of deposits (CDs), have lower expected returns than more risky ones.
The longer your bond ladder, and the greater amount of money you devote to it, the more this tradeoff affects you. That may be fine if you have enough savings that you are able to forego that long-term growth.
For many, though, that growth is necessary. Even conservative retirees often need some stocks to make sure their portfolio lasts.
The key here is moderation. Make sure that you are laddering to cover expenses but keep a long-term and properly balanced investment focus for the remainder of your savings. (And if you need more help with your savings, consider working with a financial advisor.)
Bond Ladders Can Be Hard to Diversify
It can be difficult to properly diversify bond ladders for individual investors. Most individual investors won’t invest a large enough amount to diversify with individual bonds. The problem with that is that even highly rated bonds still carry the risk of default. You need to diversify bond holdings the same way you need to diversify stocks.
Regular bond mutual funds aren’t appropriate because their value will fluctuate. This misses the point of having the bond ladder in the first place. There are target-maturity bond funds that are managed to behave like individual bonds with a fixed maturity. This reduces the diversification problem, but you may not always be able to find one that fits your timeline.