Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Subscribe
    • Shares
    • News
      • Featured Company
      • News Overview
        • Company news
        • Expert Columns
        • Germany
        • USA
        • Price movements
        • Default values
        • Small caps
        • Business
      • News Search
        • Stock News
        • CFD News
        • Foreign exchange news
        • ETF News
        • Money, Career & Lifestyle News
      • Index News
        • DAX News
        • MDAX News
        • TecDAX News
        • Dow Jones News
        • Eurostoxx News
        • NASDAQ News
        • ATX News
        • S&P 500 News
      • Other Topics
        • Private Finance News
        • Commodity News
        • Certificate News
        • Interest rate news
        • SMI News
        • Nikkei 225 News1
    • Carbon Markets
    • Raw materials
    • Funds
    • Bonds
    • Currency
    • Crypto
    • English
      • العربية
      • 简体中文
      • Nederlands
      • English
      • Français
      • Deutsch
      • Italiano
      • Português
      • Русский
      • Español
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Home » Why I think FTSE 100 dividend shares could build a better second income than the S&P 500
    News

    Why I think FTSE 100 dividend shares could build a better second income than the S&P 500

    userBy userApril 16, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Image source: Getty Images

    A second income’s a dream I’ve been building towards for several years. It’s not just a desire, it’s a necessity — if I hope to achieve my goal of early retirement.

    In recent years, my friends and colleagues have espoused the spectacular potential of US tech stocks on the S&P 500. Sure, they enjoy periods of rapid growth and many smart (and lucky) investors have secured decent returns. But for those with a long-term outlook — who aren’t trying to time the market — I find FTSE 100 dividend stocks more preferable.

    Assessing longevity

    When I try to assess where Tesla or Nvidia will be in 20 years, it’s difficult to be certain. They’re both relatively young companies that have enjoyed spectacular success in a short space of time. But both rely on niche markets that, while in high demand now, don’t have a proven future. Not to mention the fierce competition they face!

    Comparatively, the UK’s home to a wealth of companies boasting many decades of reliable performance. While the FTSE 100 only began in 1984, some of its constituents — such as Pearson and Diageo — are over 150 years old. Phoenix Group, Rolls-Royce, Shell and Barclays are all over 100 years old.

    In fact, there are no less than 37 companies on the list that are over a century old.

    Why dividends matter

    Obviously, age alone doesn’t make a company a good investment choice. If it’s failed to expand and grow in that time, something may be lacking. One good way to assess this is through dividend growth — consistently profitable businesses tend to increase their dividends every year without fail.

    Bunzl, for example, has been increasing dividends for over 30 years. However, it tends to have quite a low yield. British American Tobacco has a high yield and has been increasing dividends for almost 30 years. But the future of the tobacco industry is uncertain.

    Finding a balance

    Rather, investors may want to consider Irish business services company DCC (LSE: DCC). The 49-year-old business has a decent 4.7% yield and has been growing dividends for 25 consecutive years. It’s core focus is on investing in the energy sector.

    Despite a 10% revenue drop in 2024, it still managed to increase its adjusted operating profit by 4.1%. It also increased dividends by 5% to 196.6p per share. Overall, dividends have grown at a rate of 9.6% a year for the past decade.

    However, there are some risks due to the company’s exposure to fossil fuels. Recently, it announced plans to divest its Healthcare and Technology divisions to focus purely on the Energy business. The aim is to simplify operations and enhance shareholder returns.

    However, energy’s an inherently risky industry, currently facing notable headwinds. Although it’s pushing more towards green energy and renewables, it could take some time before this strategy turns a profit.

    Still, with solid financials and an excellent dividend track record, I like its long-term prospects. It’s the kind of reliable business that could be a good addition to consider for a passive income portfolio.



    Source link

    Share this:

    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

    Like this:

    Like Loading...

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleWhy I think FTSE 100 dividend shares could build a better second income than the S&P 500
    Next Article Vanguard Core Bond ETF (NASDAQ:VCRB) Short Interest Up 1,731.1% in March
    user
    • Website

    Related Posts

    These FTSE 100 stocks have rocketed in 2025! I think they can keep going

    May 10, 2025

    Should I buy Roblox for my Stocks and Shares ISA?

    May 10, 2025

    Yields near 6%! Here’s the dividend forecast for Sainsbury’s shares to 2028

    May 10, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

    © 2025 StockNews24. Designed by Sujon.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    %d