Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Subscribe
    • Shares
    • News
      • Featured Company
      • News Overview
        • Company news
        • Expert Columns
        • Germany
        • USA
        • Price movements
        • Default values
        • Small caps
        • Business
      • News Search
        • Stock News
        • CFD News
        • Foreign exchange news
        • ETF News
        • Money, Career & Lifestyle News
      • Index News
        • DAX News
        • MDAX News
        • TecDAX News
        • Dow Jones News
        • Eurostoxx News
        • NASDAQ News
        • ATX News
        • S&P 500 News
      • Other Topics
        • Private Finance News
        • Commodity News
        • Certificate News
        • Interest rate news
        • SMI News
        • Nikkei 225 News1
    • Carbon Markets
    • Raw materials
    • Funds
    • Bonds
    • Currency
    • Crypto
    • English
      • العربية
      • 简体中文
      • Nederlands
      • English
      • Français
      • Deutsch
      • Italiano
      • Português
      • Русский
      • Español
    StockNews24StockNews24
    Home » Companies ‘claim credit for keeping forests they never meant to clear’
    Carbon Credits

    Companies ‘claim credit for keeping forests they never meant to clear’

    userBy userMay 11, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Nearly a third of the carbon credits bought by Australia’s top emitting companies last year were based on an offsetting technique that has been banned for future projects after a government review found it would be ineffective at reducing emissions.

    More than 28 per cent of carbon offsets purchased by companies operating under the government’s safeguard mechanism in the 2023-24 financial year were based on avoided deforestation, a technique that allows landowners to earn carbon credits for not clearing native forests they are otherwise entitled to.

    Loading…



    Source link

    Share this:

    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X

    Like this:

    Like Loading...

    Related

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleFed waits, but markets gain as Trump changes his tune on tariffs | Business
    Next Article As CEO Warren Buffett steps down, should I buy Berkshire Hathaway shares?
    user
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Earning carbon credits in Pakistan | The Express Tribune

    May 11, 2025

    Royal Ascot, London Marathon and the Platinum Jubilee: Events use Scottish land to clean up their carbon footprint

    May 11, 2025

    ‘Recovery within five years’: Carbon players bullish on market revival despite geopolitical jitters

    May 10, 2025
    Add A Comment

    Leave a ReplyCancel reply

    © 2025 StockNews24. Designed by Sujon.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    %d