Google has often claimed to be a climate leader. It highlights its use of renewable energy and efficient data centers. In its 2025 sustainability report, the company said it reduced energy emissions from its data centers by 12% in 2024. This was despite the rising demand for AI.
Google Highlights Clean Energy Wins
The tech giant reported that between 2011 and 2024, its clean energy purchases helped avoid an estimated 44 million metric tons of CO₂ emissions. Additionally, it signed contracts for 8 GW of new clean energy and brought 2.5 GW online in 2024 alone. Since 2017, Google says it has matched 100% of its global electricity use with renewable energy.
To strengthen its green credentials, Google also pointed to major hardware advancements. For instance, its Ironwood TPU is reportedly 30 times more energy efficient than earlier models. The company further claimed a sixfold increase in computing power per unit of electricity since 2019.
Moreover, Google has invested in advanced clean energy solutions. Through partnerships focused on small modular nuclear reactors and geothermal energy, it positioned itself as a leader pushing the boundaries of innovation in the clean tech space.
However, a New Report Tells a Different Story
Despite these claims, a recent report sharply criticizes Google’s environmental impact, raising doubts about the effectiveness and transparency of its climate actions
Kairos Fellowship Report Critiques Google’s “Eco-Failures”
On July 2, 2025, the Kairos Fellowship released a report called Google’s Eco-Failures. It accuses Google of misleading the public about its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Google talks about cutting data center emissions and investing in energy. But the report reveals a different story: emissions are rising, and the accounting is unclear.
Key findings from the report include:
-
GHG emissions increased by 1,515% from 2010 to 2024.
-
Google emitted 21.9 million more metric tons of carbon in 2024 than in 2010.
-
Scope 2 emissions, related to purchased electricity, surged 820% during this time.
-
Scope 3 emissions (from supply chains and product use) remain high, with little transparency.
-
Only Scope 1 emissions (direct operations) showed a slight drop, just 0.31% of total emissions.
According to Kairos, Google’s focus on “market-based emissions,” which depend on renewable energy credits (RECs), hides its rising actual emissions. Instead of making real cuts, the company seems to offset its emissions on paper while expanding energy-intensive AI and cloud computing infrastructure.
Additionally, the team has also incorporated a chart (see below) from Bloomberg in July 2024 that tracks Google’s market-based emissions. It showed the enormous gap between the company’s plan and its reality.
AI Growth Fuels Energy Demand and Emissions
One major concern is the environmental impact of Google’s growing artificial intelligence infrastructure. The report links rising emissions to increased power use in data centers for generative AI services like Gemini and Google Cloud AI.
Since 2010, Google’s energy use has jumped by 1,282%, even with improvements in computing efficiency. In real terms, energy use and emissions are rising sharply, casting doubt on Google’s sustainability claims.
The Kairos report warns that efficiency metrics may distract from the real issue: massive energy growth driven by AI.
Google’s Energy Savings Aren’t as Impressive
Google often highlights its PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness) improvements. However, the real drop in non-IT energy use happened only in 2011. That year, PUE improved slightly, saving 26.3 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of energy. While it sounds good, it’s small in the bigger picture.
In 2011, Google’s top executives took 491 private jet trips. These flights consumed about 855,000 gallons of jet fuel and burned over 33.8 GWh of energy—more than the energy saved from better PUE. Just by cutting private jet flights, Google could’ve saved more energy.
Simply put, 33.8 GWh equals all the clean energy added to the U.S. power grid in 2023.
Net Zero by 2030? “Unrealistic” and Overly Dependent on Tech Hype
Google aims for net-zero emissions by 2030, but the report calls this goal “unrealistic.” Much of Google’s strategy relies on speculative technologies like advanced nuclear power and carbon-free energy (CFE), which Kairos argues aren’t advancing quickly enough to make a real impact soon.
For exampDle:
-
Deal with Kairos Power for small modular reactors (SMRs) is still in early stages.
-
Its geothermal energy project in Nevada is promising, but too small to offset emissions company-wide.
-
24/7 CFE score rose only 2% (from 64% to 66%) in 2024. Only 9 of 20 grid regions achieved over 80% CFE.
The report noted that even Google admitted progress is slower than needed, citing challenges like energy policy delays, resource limits (especially in Asia-Pacific), and rising energy demands from AI.
Water Use Raises More Questions
Environmental concerns go beyond emissions. According to Kairos, Google’s water withdrawals rose by 340% from 2016 to 2024, reaching 11 billion gallons in 2024 alone. That equals the yearly water use of over 750,000 U.S. households, nearly the entire population of Phoenix, Arizona.
Much of this water cools data centers, raising alarms about Google’s overall environmental impact, especially in drought-prone areas.
Climate Denial on YouTube Adds to the Backlash
Additionally, the report accused Google of enabling climate misinformation on YouTube. Despite the platform’s content policies, Kairos states YouTube still hosts and monetizes climate denial content against its own guidelines.
Even more concerning, in 2025, YouTube reportedly reduced moderation efforts, allowing harmful narratives to spread unchecked, undermining Google’s climate goals.
Greenwashing Allegations Erode Trust
The Kairos Fellowship claims Google’s selective transparency misleads activists, policymakers, and the public about its true climate impact. By showcasing relative improvements and speculative technologies while downplaying rising total emissions, Google risks being seen as a greenwasher rather than a true climate leader.
The group asserts that:
-
Emissions disclosures are unclear and incomplete.
-
Changes in methodology (especially regarding Scope 3 emissions) obscure year-over-year comparisons.
-
Public claims of sustainability don’t match the reality.
The report appears amid growing pressure on tech giants to lessen their environmental impacts. Data centers are expected to use as much power as 22 million U.S. homes in five years.
Furthermore, a news agency stated that an open letter in major U.S. newspapers urged the CEOs of Google, Amazon, and Microsoft to turn down fossil fuel projects. It also called for faster coal plant closures.
What’s Next for Google’s Climate Path?
Google’s environmental goals are ambitious, but its actual progress may differ. The Kairos Fellowship report shows rising emissions, a heavy reliance on credits, and slow clean energy transitions.
While its technological advances and renewable energy efforts are commendable, they may not offset the climate impact of AI-driven growth. So, unless it tackles these underlying issues beyond its current green messaging, it risks falling short of its 2030 net-zero goal.
The bottom line is that Google faces a crucial choice…The tech world is moving fast into an AI-driven future, but environmental costs are climbing. To stay credible and set a standard, the tech giant will have to move from green promises to genuine climate action. If not, it may become a symbol of high-tech greenwashing in the climate battle.
