The European Commission proposed allowing limited use of foreign carbon credits to meet its 2040 climate target but admitted it had not assessed the economic or environmental effects of the policy.
Karl Mathiesen and Zia Weise report for POLITICO.
In short:
- The proposal would let the EU buy carbon reductions from poorer countries, offsetting up to 3 percentage points of its 90% emissions cut target.
- Critics, including the EU’s own scientific advisers, warn that buying credits could weaken domestic climate action, waste funds, and risk fraud, recalling past scandals with low-quality offsets.
- The Commission says it will conduct a full impact assessment next year, but for now the cost, funding source, and scope of credit purchases remain unclear.
Why this matters:
Carbon offset systems promise cheaper routes to reduce emissions but can divert resources from cutting pollution at its source. When wealthier economies pay poorer nations to make cuts on their behalf, the results depend heavily on the integrity of the credits, and history shows many have been overstated or outright fraudulent. Without rigorous vetting, offsets can create an illusion of progress while allowing continued emissions at home. The stakes are high: Shifting funds abroad could slow investment in clean energy and infrastructure within the EU, and poorly managed credits could destabilize carbon markets.
Related: EU scales back climate leadership as populism and global inaction stall 2040 emissions goal
